This blog is in response to a question on another board I frequent. In deciding to post it in blog form here, I am taking the opportunity to organize and distill my thoughts and personal philosophy regarding our nation and the direction I see us going.
A few disclaimers up front:
1. I truly hope that my assessment and evaluation of what is likely to happen is wrong. I hope the things I foresee never occur. I also hope that there really is an Easter Bunny, Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy!
2. This will probably be a long blog, (I will try to break it up into digestible pieces), and for those who have their mind made up on either side, both boring and aggravating. For those folks, I suggest you pass this blog by.
3. My assessment and opinions are based upon history and the consequences of actions taken thus far. My opinions are mine, (c. 2015 tortminder), but you are welcome to accept them as you own, should you choose to do so. One way or the other, they are worth exactly what you paid for them.

The following question was asked on the 1branson.com "Heroes" thread:
Originally Posted by timothyb38652
QUOTE: "So if you don't think compromise is the answer then what is? Let the dems nominate the most far left leaning candidate they can and then let the republicans nominate the most far right leaning they can come up with and one of them win and nothing get done the other side refuses to cooperate with the winning side and then vast majorities of the electorate remain dissatisfied? "

-"There's got to be a way to find common ground that everyone can agree on so the country can move forward and not continue to divide and erupt into chaos which is inevitably going to happen someday if people don't star working together."

-"Sitting out elections because you don't like either candidate doesn't work. Voting for third party or independent candidates doesn't work because you'll never get enough people behind one independent candidate to make a difference."

-"I've often thought that doing away with the whole idea of running mates would be a good start. Let whoever wins take the presidency and whoever comes in second take the vice presidency. Force them to work together and see what happens." /end quote

This is actually four questions. I will attempt to answer the first one in this post.
The answer, in my opinion, is that there is no answer as you have framed the question.
Like it or not, under the current system things will continue as they are. The politicians will continue to polarize their bases and, thereby, keep the people disunited and consequently, keep themselves in power.


The fact is that what currently passes as the United States of America would be unrecognizable to the Founding Fathers. Whatever this country is, it is not the noble experiment begun by the patriots who gave birth to what was once a "shining city on the hill".

There are numerous reasons for this, but the cold, hard fact is that as early as 1784, then President George Washington lead a force of troops from Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania and New Jersey to crush a tax rebellion by farmer/distillers who were protesting an excise tax on their distilled spirits since they had no opportunity to have input on the tax and felt that it was, once again, "Taxation without representation", a major factor in the recent war of independence. (Research Whiskey Rebellion or Whiskey Insurrection). It was the "Father of our country", George Washington, who was the first Chief Executive who used the power of the Federal Government to overcome the sovereignty of the people.

The Whiskey Rebellion demonstrated that the new national government had the will and the ability to suppress violent resistance to its laws. The whiskey excise remained difficult to collect, however.

These events contributed to the formation of political parties in the United States, a process already underway. The whiskey tax was repealed after Thomas Jefferson's Republican Party, which opposed Hamilton's Federalist Party, came to power in 1801.

To quickly highlight a few of the next Presidents, we have John Adams, who passed the Alien and Sedition Acts, which prevented people from criticizing the federal government;

-Thomas Jefferson, who made the Louisiana purchase without authorization from Congress or the people;

-James Madison, who lost the war of 1812 to the British & got the White House burned;

-James Monroe, who is famous for "The Monroe Doctrine" that started the US colonial expansion era. Anti-Semitic to the point of dismissing his Consul to Tunis when he discovered that the man was Jewish;

-John Quincy Adams, became President when the electoral college failed to give a majority of votes to either candidate, (Andrew Jackson actually had more electoral votes, but not enough to attain the Presidency). In a deal with Henry Clay, Clay switched his vote to Adams and was rewarded by becoming Adams' Secretary of State. He also had a pet alligator which he kept in the White House bathtub;

-Andrew Jackson, a notorious hothead, he was involved in over 100 duels in his lifetime. He was responsible for the Indian Removal Act which resulted in the famed "Trail of Tears" and the death of thousands of women, children and elderly. He also believed that the earth was flat;

-Martin Van Buren, his Presidency was notable only for the Financial Panic of 1837. He was a one-term President;

-William Henry Harrison, like many of the politicians of today, Harrison did a lot of pretending to be a common man and a lot of actually being from an extremely wealthy slave-owning family. He started things off with a bang, giving the longest ever inaugural address for two hours. Then he got pneumonia and perished. That was his presidency, (he is a distant relative of Rick Harrison of the History Channel "Pawn Stars";

-John Tyler, His presidency started in controversy, as the existing Constitution didn’t really have instructions for what to do when a president dies in office. There was The Princeton Disaster, when Tyler and his cabinet members were on a ceremonial cruise and a huge naval gun aboard the ship fired a celebratory shot—only it malfunctioned and exploded on the boat, killing off much of Tyler’s cabinet. He basically got nothing done in office and went down as one of history’s worst presidents;

-James K. Polk, This man is an anomaly in American politics. Emerging in 1845 as an unlikely dark horse election-winner, Polk was a rare promise-keeping and efficient president. He began by announcing that he would only seek one term in office, and followed by laying out a clear, ambitious agenda—re-establish an independent Treasury, reduce tariffs, and acquire a bunch of Western land. Then he spent his one term taking no vacations, accomplishing his full agenda, and didn’t run again. Weird, right?;

-Zachary Taylor, He died suddenly after eating some raw fruit, about a year into his presidency. Historians have speculated that he may have been poisoned, but there’s no conclusive evidence either way;

-Millard Filmore, proposed The Compromise of 1850, which momentarily quieted tensions, successfully kicking the can down the road. One interesting achievement of his presidency was commissioning the Perry Expedition to try to open up isolationist Japan, which triggered Japan’s new path toward becoming a powerful, modern nation;

-Franklin Pierce, Franklin Pierce was good at some things, like law and fishing. He was also bad at some things, like being the president;

-James Buchanan, James Buchanan is the next in line and the lowest-ranked of all the presidents so far, at 42nd. Buchanan’s four years were insanely tense and rocky, with Civil War furor bubbling over and an economic crisis—the Panic of 1857—not helping the situation.


-And that brings us to the 16th. President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, who deserves an entire post all his own.

Thus endeth today's' lesson in American history and some of why we are going to hell in a handbasket.

...to be continued