
Originally Posted by
airdrop
Well this information has to come from somewhere because it's not coming from the Fake Media or our socialist science outlets . This brings up a few questions what is the end game here for lying to the people by the warmers . On the surface it looks like power and money , tax carbon and control countries by doing that but if you know that the end results will really be colder climate change that leads to more famines and starving people , either your crazy or something else even more evil is working under the surface . So you go back to the last mini ice ages and look at what happened when famine racked the world , plague . So why would someone want to throw us to the wolf of death , Population control . But how is that possible when we know how to control the black death ? Look out there and ask yourself what is the NEXT plague , well if the people were depleted and the right strain broke out , Bird Flu would do it and much better than the old plagues that killed millions . So if you had it in your mind that the population needed to be culled why wouldn't you miss direct the world and hope for the grime reaper to enter the house of man and do what you think is right . I don't care were the information comes from that might save us , we're sure not getting it form the people that want to kill us . I don't care if a few youtubers want to make a little money getting out the word , it's still the word , more than we're hearing from the powers that be .
I do care if they are trying to make money off it. That motivation brings into question the information they are 'selling'. Target the audience, sell them what they want, if they don't know what they want, define it for them, marketing 101. If that sounds familiar, it should. Main stream media took that one step further. That is why I called it switching one set of talking heads for another.
There are all points of the political spectrum online. What makes one more trusted than another? Are the trusted ones trusted because they align with what you believe, or are they trusted because they put information out that is what it is, rather than what we would have it be? That is an important distinction.
How is it opinions are formed? Are they formed via shutting out opposing views, or are they formed from personal research and critical thinking?
The extreme elements of both the left and the right tend towards attempting to shut out one another. Does shouting down opposing thoughts make a person's thoughts and opinions right? Letting one person or groups of people spoon feed my opinion to me without researching it for myself, makes me no better than the people standing at the back of townhall meetings or university lectures from guest speakers shouting down opposing opinions.
The Internet if used for its originally intended purpose, empowers the individual to access nearly any background information needed to form their own thoughts and opinions.
http://deep-web.org/how-to-research/...earch-engines/
You can start at that link for research regarding your first question.
My information and opinions are my own. They may be right, they may be wrong, but you can be damn sure they are born of either direct experience or research.
When the present determines the future, but the approximate present does not approximately determine the future: Edward Lorenz